A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite

Bjorn Berg, Brian Denton, Heidi Nelson, Hari Balasubramanian, Ahmed Rahman, Angela Bailey, Keith Lindor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aims. Colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer death, is preventable with colonoscopic screening. Colonoscopy cost is high, and optimizing resource utilization for colonoscopy is important. This studys aim is to evaluate resource allocation for optimal use of facilities for colonoscopy screening. Method. The authors used data from a computerized colonoscopy database to develop a discrete event simulation model of a colonoscopy suite. Operational configurations were compared by varying the number of endoscopists, procedure rooms, the patient arrival times, and procedure room turnaround time. Performance measures included the number of patients served during the clinic day and utilization of key resources. Further analysis included considering patient waiting time tradeoffs as well as the sensitivity of the system to procedure room turnaround time. Results. The maximum number of patients served is linearly related to the number of procedure rooms in the colonoscopy suite, with a fixed room to endoscopist ratio. Utilization of intake and recovery resources becomes more efficient as the number of procedure rooms increases, indicating the potential benefits of large colonoscopy suites. Procedure room turnaround time has a significant influence on patient throughput, procedure room utilization, and endoscopist utilization for varying ratios between 1:1 and 2:1 rooms per endoscopist. Finally, changes in the patient arrival schedule can reduce patient waiting time while not requiring a longer clinic day. Conclusions. Suite managers should keep a procedure room to endoscopist ratio between 1:1 and 2:1 while considering the utilization of related key resources as a decision factor as well. The sensitivity of the system to processes such as turnaround time should be evaluated before improvement efforts are made.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)380-387
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Patients' Rooms
Resource Allocation
Cause of Death
Colorectal Neoplasms
Appointments and Schedules
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Discrete event
  • Simulation.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite. / Berg, Bjorn; Denton, Brian; Nelson, Heidi; Balasubramanian, Hari; Rahman, Ahmed; Bailey, Angela; Lindor, Keith.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 30, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 380-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berg, B, Denton, B, Nelson, H, Balasubramanian, H, Rahman, A, Bailey, A & Lindor, K 2010, 'A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite', Medical Decision Making, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09345890
Berg, Bjorn ; Denton, Brian ; Nelson, Heidi ; Balasubramanian, Hari ; Rahman, Ahmed ; Bailey, Angela ; Lindor, Keith. / A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite. In: Medical Decision Making. 2010 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 380-387.
@article{ebbd96fda3c24b0baaf96a90b8d79208,
title = "A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite",
abstract = "Background and Aims. Colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer death, is preventable with colonoscopic screening. Colonoscopy cost is high, and optimizing resource utilization for colonoscopy is important. This studys aim is to evaluate resource allocation for optimal use of facilities for colonoscopy screening. Method. The authors used data from a computerized colonoscopy database to develop a discrete event simulation model of a colonoscopy suite. Operational configurations were compared by varying the number of endoscopists, procedure rooms, the patient arrival times, and procedure room turnaround time. Performance measures included the number of patients served during the clinic day and utilization of key resources. Further analysis included considering patient waiting time tradeoffs as well as the sensitivity of the system to procedure room turnaround time. Results. The maximum number of patients served is linearly related to the number of procedure rooms in the colonoscopy suite, with a fixed room to endoscopist ratio. Utilization of intake and recovery resources becomes more efficient as the number of procedure rooms increases, indicating the potential benefits of large colonoscopy suites. Procedure room turnaround time has a significant influence on patient throughput, procedure room utilization, and endoscopist utilization for varying ratios between 1:1 and 2:1 rooms per endoscopist. Finally, changes in the patient arrival schedule can reduce patient waiting time while not requiring a longer clinic day. Conclusions. Suite managers should keep a procedure room to endoscopist ratio between 1:1 and 2:1 while considering the utilization of related key resources as a decision factor as well. The sensitivity of the system to processes such as turnaround time should be evaluated before improvement efforts are made.",
keywords = "Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Discrete event, Simulation.",
author = "Bjorn Berg and Brian Denton and Heidi Nelson and Hari Balasubramanian and Ahmed Rahman and Angela Bailey and Keith Lindor",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X09345890",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "380--387",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite

AU - Berg, Bjorn

AU - Denton, Brian

AU - Nelson, Heidi

AU - Balasubramanian, Hari

AU - Rahman, Ahmed

AU - Bailey, Angela

AU - Lindor, Keith

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Background and Aims. Colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer death, is preventable with colonoscopic screening. Colonoscopy cost is high, and optimizing resource utilization for colonoscopy is important. This studys aim is to evaluate resource allocation for optimal use of facilities for colonoscopy screening. Method. The authors used data from a computerized colonoscopy database to develop a discrete event simulation model of a colonoscopy suite. Operational configurations were compared by varying the number of endoscopists, procedure rooms, the patient arrival times, and procedure room turnaround time. Performance measures included the number of patients served during the clinic day and utilization of key resources. Further analysis included considering patient waiting time tradeoffs as well as the sensitivity of the system to procedure room turnaround time. Results. The maximum number of patients served is linearly related to the number of procedure rooms in the colonoscopy suite, with a fixed room to endoscopist ratio. Utilization of intake and recovery resources becomes more efficient as the number of procedure rooms increases, indicating the potential benefits of large colonoscopy suites. Procedure room turnaround time has a significant influence on patient throughput, procedure room utilization, and endoscopist utilization for varying ratios between 1:1 and 2:1 rooms per endoscopist. Finally, changes in the patient arrival schedule can reduce patient waiting time while not requiring a longer clinic day. Conclusions. Suite managers should keep a procedure room to endoscopist ratio between 1:1 and 2:1 while considering the utilization of related key resources as a decision factor as well. The sensitivity of the system to processes such as turnaround time should be evaluated before improvement efforts are made.

AB - Background and Aims. Colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer death, is preventable with colonoscopic screening. Colonoscopy cost is high, and optimizing resource utilization for colonoscopy is important. This studys aim is to evaluate resource allocation for optimal use of facilities for colonoscopy screening. Method. The authors used data from a computerized colonoscopy database to develop a discrete event simulation model of a colonoscopy suite. Operational configurations were compared by varying the number of endoscopists, procedure rooms, the patient arrival times, and procedure room turnaround time. Performance measures included the number of patients served during the clinic day and utilization of key resources. Further analysis included considering patient waiting time tradeoffs as well as the sensitivity of the system to procedure room turnaround time. Results. The maximum number of patients served is linearly related to the number of procedure rooms in the colonoscopy suite, with a fixed room to endoscopist ratio. Utilization of intake and recovery resources becomes more efficient as the number of procedure rooms increases, indicating the potential benefits of large colonoscopy suites. Procedure room turnaround time has a significant influence on patient throughput, procedure room utilization, and endoscopist utilization for varying ratios between 1:1 and 2:1 rooms per endoscopist. Finally, changes in the patient arrival schedule can reduce patient waiting time while not requiring a longer clinic day. Conclusions. Suite managers should keep a procedure room to endoscopist ratio between 1:1 and 2:1 while considering the utilization of related key resources as a decision factor as well. The sensitivity of the system to processes such as turnaround time should be evaluated before improvement efforts are made.

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Discrete event

KW - Simulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952961965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952961965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X09345890

DO - 10.1177/0272989X09345890

M3 - Article

C2 - 19773583

AN - SCOPUS:77952961965

VL - 30

SP - 380

EP - 387

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -