A developmental perspective of self-construals and sex differences: comment on Cross and Madson (1997)

Carol Martin, D. N. Ruble

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

S. E. Cross and L. Madson (1997) proposed that women and men differ in self-construals, with women as interdependent and men as independent, and that these construals are seen to underlie many sex differences in social behavior. In this article, the authors address the issues of sex differences in self-construals, the stability of self-construals, and the centrality of interdependence-independence to sex differences. They examine the proposal next from a developmental perspective, suggesting that development of the self does not precede children's gender-related behavior. Evidence regarding the socialization processes that may contribute to sex differences in self-construals is largely inconclusive, especially regarding the differential treatment of boys and girls by parents. Their developmental perspective provides insights into ways that Cross and Madson's approach can be elaborated to explain sex differences in social behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume122
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Social Behavior
Socialization
Parents
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A developmental perspective of self-construals and sex differences : comment on Cross and Madson (1997). / Martin, Carol; Ruble, D. N.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 122, No. 1, 07.1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b50ee10d117469fb44bede5230fbff2,
title = "A developmental perspective of self-construals and sex differences: comment on Cross and Madson (1997)",
abstract = "S. E. Cross and L. Madson (1997) proposed that women and men differ in self-construals, with women as interdependent and men as independent, and that these construals are seen to underlie many sex differences in social behavior. In this article, the authors address the issues of sex differences in self-construals, the stability of self-construals, and the centrality of interdependence-independence to sex differences. They examine the proposal next from a developmental perspective, suggesting that development of the self does not precede children's gender-related behavior. Evidence regarding the socialization processes that may contribute to sex differences in self-construals is largely inconclusive, especially regarding the differential treatment of boys and girls by parents. Their developmental perspective provides insights into ways that Cross and Madson's approach can be elaborated to explain sex differences in social behavior.",
author = "Carol Martin and Ruble, {D. N.}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A developmental perspective of self-construals and sex differences

T2 - comment on Cross and Madson (1997)

AU - Martin, Carol

AU - Ruble, D. N.

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - S. E. Cross and L. Madson (1997) proposed that women and men differ in self-construals, with women as interdependent and men as independent, and that these construals are seen to underlie many sex differences in social behavior. In this article, the authors address the issues of sex differences in self-construals, the stability of self-construals, and the centrality of interdependence-independence to sex differences. They examine the proposal next from a developmental perspective, suggesting that development of the self does not precede children's gender-related behavior. Evidence regarding the socialization processes that may contribute to sex differences in self-construals is largely inconclusive, especially regarding the differential treatment of boys and girls by parents. Their developmental perspective provides insights into ways that Cross and Madson's approach can be elaborated to explain sex differences in social behavior.

AB - S. E. Cross and L. Madson (1997) proposed that women and men differ in self-construals, with women as interdependent and men as independent, and that these construals are seen to underlie many sex differences in social behavior. In this article, the authors address the issues of sex differences in self-construals, the stability of self-construals, and the centrality of interdependence-independence to sex differences. They examine the proposal next from a developmental perspective, suggesting that development of the self does not precede children's gender-related behavior. Evidence regarding the socialization processes that may contribute to sex differences in self-construals is largely inconclusive, especially regarding the differential treatment of boys and girls by parents. Their developmental perspective provides insights into ways that Cross and Madson's approach can be elaborated to explain sex differences in social behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031180465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031180465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9204779

AN - SCOPUS:0031180465

VL - 122

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 1

ER -