A Decade of Professional Development Research for Inclusive Education: A Critical Review and Notes for a Research Program

Federico R. Waitoller, Alfredo Artiles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We reviewed the research on professional development (PD) for inclusive education between 2000 and 2009 to answer three questions: (a) How is inclusive education defined in PD research? (b) How is PD for inclusive education studied? (c) How is teacher learning examined in PD research for inclusive education? Systematic procedures were used to identify relevant research and analyze the target studies. We found that most PD research for inclusive education utilized a unitary approach toward difference and exclusion and that teacher learning for inclusive education is undertheorized. We recommend using an intersectional approach to understand difference and exclusion and examining boundary practices to examine teacher learning for inclusive education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-356
Number of pages38
JournalReview of Educational Research
Volume83
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

education
exclusion
teacher
learning

Keywords

  • boundary practices
  • inclusive education
  • intersectionality
  • professional development
  • teacher learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A Decade of Professional Development Research for Inclusive Education : A Critical Review and Notes for a Research Program. / Waitoller, Federico R.; Artiles, Alfredo.

In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 83, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 319-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4321988bb4d640b0833054904a20fcf8,
title = "A Decade of Professional Development Research for Inclusive Education: A Critical Review and Notes for a Research Program",
abstract = "We reviewed the research on professional development (PD) for inclusive education between 2000 and 2009 to answer three questions: (a) How is inclusive education defined in PD research? (b) How is PD for inclusive education studied? (c) How is teacher learning examined in PD research for inclusive education? Systematic procedures were used to identify relevant research and analyze the target studies. We found that most PD research for inclusive education utilized a unitary approach toward difference and exclusion and that teacher learning for inclusive education is undertheorized. We recommend using an intersectional approach to understand difference and exclusion and examining boundary practices to examine teacher learning for inclusive education.",
keywords = "boundary practices, inclusive education, intersectionality, professional development, teacher learning",
author = "Waitoller, {Federico R.} and Alfredo Artiles",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3102/0034654313483905",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "319--356",
journal = "Review of Educational Research",
issn = "0034-6543",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Decade of Professional Development Research for Inclusive Education

T2 - A Critical Review and Notes for a Research Program

AU - Waitoller, Federico R.

AU - Artiles, Alfredo

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - We reviewed the research on professional development (PD) for inclusive education between 2000 and 2009 to answer three questions: (a) How is inclusive education defined in PD research? (b) How is PD for inclusive education studied? (c) How is teacher learning examined in PD research for inclusive education? Systematic procedures were used to identify relevant research and analyze the target studies. We found that most PD research for inclusive education utilized a unitary approach toward difference and exclusion and that teacher learning for inclusive education is undertheorized. We recommend using an intersectional approach to understand difference and exclusion and examining boundary practices to examine teacher learning for inclusive education.

AB - We reviewed the research on professional development (PD) for inclusive education between 2000 and 2009 to answer three questions: (a) How is inclusive education defined in PD research? (b) How is PD for inclusive education studied? (c) How is teacher learning examined in PD research for inclusive education? Systematic procedures were used to identify relevant research and analyze the target studies. We found that most PD research for inclusive education utilized a unitary approach toward difference and exclusion and that teacher learning for inclusive education is undertheorized. We recommend using an intersectional approach to understand difference and exclusion and examining boundary practices to examine teacher learning for inclusive education.

KW - boundary practices

KW - inclusive education

KW - intersectionality

KW - professional development

KW - teacher learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880986218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880986218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3102/0034654313483905

DO - 10.3102/0034654313483905

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880986218

VL - 83

SP - 319

EP - 356

JO - Review of Educational Research

JF - Review of Educational Research

SN - 0034-6543

IS - 3

ER -