A daily process approach to individual differences in stress-related alcohol use

Stephen Armeli, Michael Todd, Cynthia Mohr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In our research we have used a variety of daily designs (paper-and-pencil or Internet-based daily diaries, experience sampling via palmtop computers) to examine how individual differences in coping styles, alcohol-outcome expectancies, and drinking motives predict stress-related and negative affect-related alcohol use. Our work has furthered research in this area in two ways. First, we have examined how these risk factors are associated with within-person associations among temporally proximal reports of Stressors, negative affect, and alcohol use. Second, we have examined whether purportedly stable individual-difference factors demonstrate meaningful within-person variation and thus also might be conceptualized as important process variables. Our findings from this line of research, along with those from new data that we present, indicate some disparities between the results found at the within-person versus the between-person levels of analysis. More importantly, this line of research offers insights into questions that could not be addressed using traditional cross-sectional or long-term longitudinal designs. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1657-1686
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Individuality
Alcohols
Research
Handheld Computers
Internet
Drinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

A daily process approach to individual differences in stress-related alcohol use. / Armeli, Stephen; Todd, Michael; Mohr, Cynthia.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 73, No. 6, 01.12.2005, p. 1657-1686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Armeli, Stephen ; Todd, Michael ; Mohr, Cynthia. / A daily process approach to individual differences in stress-related alcohol use. In: Journal of Personality. 2005 ; Vol. 73, No. 6. pp. 1657-1686.
@article{af7d24e931994755969dce62ec77e76b,
title = "A daily process approach to individual differences in stress-related alcohol use",
abstract = "In our research we have used a variety of daily designs (paper-and-pencil or Internet-based daily diaries, experience sampling via palmtop computers) to examine how individual differences in coping styles, alcohol-outcome expectancies, and drinking motives predict stress-related and negative affect-related alcohol use. Our work has furthered research in this area in two ways. First, we have examined how these risk factors are associated with within-person associations among temporally proximal reports of Stressors, negative affect, and alcohol use. Second, we have examined whether purportedly stable individual-difference factors demonstrate meaningful within-person variation and thus also might be conceptualized as important process variables. Our findings from this line of research, along with those from new data that we present, indicate some disparities between the results found at the within-person versus the between-person levels of analysis. More importantly, this line of research offers insights into questions that could not be addressed using traditional cross-sectional or long-term longitudinal designs. Limitations and future directions are discussed.",
author = "Stephen Armeli and Michael Todd and Cynthia Mohr",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.0022-3506.2005.00362.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1657--1686",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A daily process approach to individual differences in stress-related alcohol use

AU - Armeli, Stephen

AU - Todd, Michael

AU - Mohr, Cynthia

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - In our research we have used a variety of daily designs (paper-and-pencil or Internet-based daily diaries, experience sampling via palmtop computers) to examine how individual differences in coping styles, alcohol-outcome expectancies, and drinking motives predict stress-related and negative affect-related alcohol use. Our work has furthered research in this area in two ways. First, we have examined how these risk factors are associated with within-person associations among temporally proximal reports of Stressors, negative affect, and alcohol use. Second, we have examined whether purportedly stable individual-difference factors demonstrate meaningful within-person variation and thus also might be conceptualized as important process variables. Our findings from this line of research, along with those from new data that we present, indicate some disparities between the results found at the within-person versus the between-person levels of analysis. More importantly, this line of research offers insights into questions that could not be addressed using traditional cross-sectional or long-term longitudinal designs. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

AB - In our research we have used a variety of daily designs (paper-and-pencil or Internet-based daily diaries, experience sampling via palmtop computers) to examine how individual differences in coping styles, alcohol-outcome expectancies, and drinking motives predict stress-related and negative affect-related alcohol use. Our work has furthered research in this area in two ways. First, we have examined how these risk factors are associated with within-person associations among temporally proximal reports of Stressors, negative affect, and alcohol use. Second, we have examined whether purportedly stable individual-difference factors demonstrate meaningful within-person variation and thus also might be conceptualized as important process variables. Our findings from this line of research, along with those from new data that we present, indicate some disparities between the results found at the within-person versus the between-person levels of analysis. More importantly, this line of research offers insights into questions that could not be addressed using traditional cross-sectional or long-term longitudinal designs. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28044455422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28044455422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2005.00362.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2005.00362.x

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 1657

EP - 1686

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 6

ER -