A course on multimedia QoS networking: Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation

Martin Reisslein, Jana Reisslein, Patrick Seeling

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A companion paper describes the development and evaluation of the on-campus format of a novel Multimedia QoS Networking course that introduces students to the basic principles and current developments in this emerging field through a combination of lecture, topic exploration, and paper critiquing and discussion. This paper presents (i) the transformation of the course from the on-campus-only format to a hybrid on-campus/distance learning format, and (ii) the comparative evaluation of the two formats and different forms of the paper critique discussions in the hybrid format. While the lecture (40% of class time) and topic exploration (30% of class time) components could be transformed with standard approaches to the hybrid on-campus/distance education with streaming class video format, the transformation of the highly interactive paper critique discussions (30% of class time), which are crucial for developing a deep understanding of the course content, proved challenging. Three different forms of the paper critique discussion were tested and evaluated: 1) in-class discussion (with distance students visiting the campus or viewing the video of the recorded discussion), 2) asynchronous web-based discussion board, and 3) synchronous web-based live chat. The two course formats as well as the different forms of the paper critique discussion in the hybrid course format were evaluated through extensive student surveys and interviews. The results indicate that student attitudes were approximately equally positive toward both course formats. There was a tendency for the asynchronous discussions to be perceived more positively in terms of learning effectiveness and effectiveness of interaction with the peers than the live chat discussion, while the live chat was preferred in terms of interaction with the instructor. These results and the reported student feedback to the open-ended survey questions and the interviews provide valuable guidance for designing interactive seminar-style courses on emerging topics in a hybrid format.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
Volume2005
StatePublished - 2005
EventFrontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05 - Indianapolis, IN, United States
Duration: Oct 19 2005Oct 22 2005

Other

OtherFrontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05
CountryUnited States
CityIndianapolis, IN
Period10/19/0510/22/05

Fingerprint

Quality of service
Students
Distance education
Technical presentations
Feedback

Keywords

  • Distance learning
  • Hybrid course
  • Multimedia networking
  • Paper critiques
  • Paper discussions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Reisslein, M., Reisslein, J., & Seeling, P. (2005). A course on multimedia QoS networking: Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE (Vol. 2005). [1612288]

A course on multimedia QoS networking : Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation. / Reisslein, Martin; Reisslein, Jana; Seeling, Patrick.

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Vol. 2005 2005. 1612288.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Reisslein, M, Reisslein, J & Seeling, P 2005, A course on multimedia QoS networking: Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation. in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. vol. 2005, 1612288, Frontiers in Education - 35th Annual Conference 2005, FIE' 05, Indianapolis, IN, United States, 10/19/05.
Reisslein M, Reisslein J, Seeling P. A course on multimedia QoS networking: Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Vol. 2005. 2005. 1612288
Reisslein, Martin ; Reisslein, Jana ; Seeling, Patrick. / A course on multimedia QoS networking : Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Vol. 2005 2005.
@inproceedings{6956e1f0238d4d738c978d80be1ab8d5,
title = "A course on multimedia QoS networking: Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation",
abstract = "A companion paper describes the development and evaluation of the on-campus format of a novel Multimedia QoS Networking course that introduces students to the basic principles and current developments in this emerging field through a combination of lecture, topic exploration, and paper critiquing and discussion. This paper presents (i) the transformation of the course from the on-campus-only format to a hybrid on-campus/distance learning format, and (ii) the comparative evaluation of the two formats and different forms of the paper critique discussions in the hybrid format. While the lecture (40{\%} of class time) and topic exploration (30{\%} of class time) components could be transformed with standard approaches to the hybrid on-campus/distance education with streaming class video format, the transformation of the highly interactive paper critique discussions (30{\%} of class time), which are crucial for developing a deep understanding of the course content, proved challenging. Three different forms of the paper critique discussion were tested and evaluated: 1) in-class discussion (with distance students visiting the campus or viewing the video of the recorded discussion), 2) asynchronous web-based discussion board, and 3) synchronous web-based live chat. The two course formats as well as the different forms of the paper critique discussion in the hybrid course format were evaluated through extensive student surveys and interviews. The results indicate that student attitudes were approximately equally positive toward both course formats. There was a tendency for the asynchronous discussions to be perceived more positively in terms of learning effectiveness and effectiveness of interaction with the peers than the live chat discussion, while the live chat was preferred in terms of interaction with the instructor. These results and the reported student feedback to the open-ended survey questions and the interviews provide valuable guidance for designing interactive seminar-style courses on emerging topics in a hybrid format.",
keywords = "Distance learning, Hybrid course, Multimedia networking, Paper critiques, Paper discussions",
author = "Martin Reisslein and Jana Reisslein and Patrick Seeling",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0780390776",
volume = "2005",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A course on multimedia QoS networking

T2 - Transition to hybrid offering and comparative evaluation

AU - Reisslein, Martin

AU - Reisslein, Jana

AU - Seeling, Patrick

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - A companion paper describes the development and evaluation of the on-campus format of a novel Multimedia QoS Networking course that introduces students to the basic principles and current developments in this emerging field through a combination of lecture, topic exploration, and paper critiquing and discussion. This paper presents (i) the transformation of the course from the on-campus-only format to a hybrid on-campus/distance learning format, and (ii) the comparative evaluation of the two formats and different forms of the paper critique discussions in the hybrid format. While the lecture (40% of class time) and topic exploration (30% of class time) components could be transformed with standard approaches to the hybrid on-campus/distance education with streaming class video format, the transformation of the highly interactive paper critique discussions (30% of class time), which are crucial for developing a deep understanding of the course content, proved challenging. Three different forms of the paper critique discussion were tested and evaluated: 1) in-class discussion (with distance students visiting the campus or viewing the video of the recorded discussion), 2) asynchronous web-based discussion board, and 3) synchronous web-based live chat. The two course formats as well as the different forms of the paper critique discussion in the hybrid course format were evaluated through extensive student surveys and interviews. The results indicate that student attitudes were approximately equally positive toward both course formats. There was a tendency for the asynchronous discussions to be perceived more positively in terms of learning effectiveness and effectiveness of interaction with the peers than the live chat discussion, while the live chat was preferred in terms of interaction with the instructor. These results and the reported student feedback to the open-ended survey questions and the interviews provide valuable guidance for designing interactive seminar-style courses on emerging topics in a hybrid format.

AB - A companion paper describes the development and evaluation of the on-campus format of a novel Multimedia QoS Networking course that introduces students to the basic principles and current developments in this emerging field through a combination of lecture, topic exploration, and paper critiquing and discussion. This paper presents (i) the transformation of the course from the on-campus-only format to a hybrid on-campus/distance learning format, and (ii) the comparative evaluation of the two formats and different forms of the paper critique discussions in the hybrid format. While the lecture (40% of class time) and topic exploration (30% of class time) components could be transformed with standard approaches to the hybrid on-campus/distance education with streaming class video format, the transformation of the highly interactive paper critique discussions (30% of class time), which are crucial for developing a deep understanding of the course content, proved challenging. Three different forms of the paper critique discussion were tested and evaluated: 1) in-class discussion (with distance students visiting the campus or viewing the video of the recorded discussion), 2) asynchronous web-based discussion board, and 3) synchronous web-based live chat. The two course formats as well as the different forms of the paper critique discussion in the hybrid course format were evaluated through extensive student surveys and interviews. The results indicate that student attitudes were approximately equally positive toward both course formats. There was a tendency for the asynchronous discussions to be perceived more positively in terms of learning effectiveness and effectiveness of interaction with the peers than the live chat discussion, while the live chat was preferred in terms of interaction with the instructor. These results and the reported student feedback to the open-ended survey questions and the interviews provide valuable guidance for designing interactive seminar-style courses on emerging topics in a hybrid format.

KW - Distance learning

KW - Hybrid course

KW - Multimedia networking

KW - Paper critiques

KW - Paper discussions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947275112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947275112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:33947275112

SN - 0780390776

SN - 9780780390775

VL - 2005

BT - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

ER -