A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university

Uttam Gaulee, Brenda Lee, Douglas Whitaker, Natalie Khoury Ridgewell, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Dayna M. Watson, Colleen Butcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This constructivist study explores 16 graduate assistants’ (GAs) healthcare experiences and uses grounded theory to create a model of graduate assistants’ experiences with university-provided healthcare in a large research university. The model is composed of four broad components: (a) systems; (b) access, care and coverage; (c) knowledge, quality and cost; and (d) self. Graduate assistants’ needs and expectations constantly negotiate various systems in the model. Expanding upon the limited research regarding graduate student healthcare, this study provides implications for higher education administrators and policy makers. Based on our study findings we argue that it is not sufficient for university administrations to simply provide paid health insurance “options” without robust support systems on campus. Because students are often stressed out, lack time and energy, and find it hard to navigate the complicated systems of profit-driven health care industry, the lack of direct support in graduate students’ day-to-day healthcare needs can cause tremendous loss on their success and productivity. Hence, universities have tremendous opportunities to better understand and address their graduate students’ real needs so as to add value to institutional success and productivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
Pages (from-to)482-497
Number of pages16
JournalQualitative Report
Volume20
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Allied Health Personnel
assistant
graduate
Students
university
Administrative Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Research
experience
Health Care Sector
Health Insurance
student
productivity
university administration
lack
Education
grounded theory
Costs and Cost Analysis
health insurance
profit

Keywords

  • Administration
  • Constructivism
  • Graduate students
  • Healthcare
  • Higher education
  • Learning environment
  • Policy
  • Qualitative research
  • Student benefits
  • Union

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Gaulee, U., Lee, B., Whitaker, D., Ridgewell, N. K., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Watson, D. M., & Butcher, C. (2015). A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university. Qualitative Report, 20(4), 482-497. [7].

A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university. / Gaulee, Uttam; Lee, Brenda; Whitaker, Douglas; Ridgewell, Natalie Khoury; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Watson, Dayna M.; Butcher, Colleen.

In: Qualitative Report, Vol. 20, No. 4, 7, 01.04.2015, p. 482-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gaulee, U, Lee, B, Whitaker, D, Ridgewell, NK, Koro-Ljungberg, M, Watson, DM & Butcher, C 2015, 'A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university', Qualitative Report, vol. 20, no. 4, 7, pp. 482-497.
Gaulee U, Lee B, Whitaker D, Ridgewell NK, Koro-Ljungberg M, Watson DM et al. A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university. Qualitative Report. 2015 Apr 1;20(4):482-497. 7.
Gaulee, Uttam ; Lee, Brenda ; Whitaker, Douglas ; Ridgewell, Natalie Khoury ; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka ; Watson, Dayna M. ; Butcher, Colleen. / A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university. In: Qualitative Report. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 482-497.
@article{21a6233503fa4d06918cc00d84932272,
title = "A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university",
abstract = "This constructivist study explores 16 graduate assistants’ (GAs) healthcare experiences and uses grounded theory to create a model of graduate assistants’ experiences with university-provided healthcare in a large research university. The model is composed of four broad components: (a) systems; (b) access, care and coverage; (c) knowledge, quality and cost; and (d) self. Graduate assistants’ needs and expectations constantly negotiate various systems in the model. Expanding upon the limited research regarding graduate student healthcare, this study provides implications for higher education administrators and policy makers. Based on our study findings we argue that it is not sufficient for university administrations to simply provide paid health insurance “options” without robust support systems on campus. Because students are often stressed out, lack time and energy, and find it hard to navigate the complicated systems of profit-driven health care industry, the lack of direct support in graduate students’ day-to-day healthcare needs can cause tremendous loss on their success and productivity. Hence, universities have tremendous opportunities to better understand and address their graduate students’ real needs so as to add value to institutional success and productivity.",
keywords = "Administration, Constructivism, Graduate students, Healthcare, Higher education, Learning environment, Policy, Qualitative research, Student benefits, Union",
author = "Uttam Gaulee and Brenda Lee and Douglas Whitaker and Ridgewell, {Natalie Khoury} and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Watson, {Dayna M.} and Colleen Butcher",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "482--497",
journal = "Qualitative Report",
issn = "1052-0147",
publisher = "Nova Southeastern University",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A constructivist study of graduate assistants’ healthcare experiences in a research university

AU - Gaulee, Uttam

AU - Lee, Brenda

AU - Whitaker, Douglas

AU - Ridgewell, Natalie Khoury

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Watson, Dayna M.

AU - Butcher, Colleen

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - This constructivist study explores 16 graduate assistants’ (GAs) healthcare experiences and uses grounded theory to create a model of graduate assistants’ experiences with university-provided healthcare in a large research university. The model is composed of four broad components: (a) systems; (b) access, care and coverage; (c) knowledge, quality and cost; and (d) self. Graduate assistants’ needs and expectations constantly negotiate various systems in the model. Expanding upon the limited research regarding graduate student healthcare, this study provides implications for higher education administrators and policy makers. Based on our study findings we argue that it is not sufficient for university administrations to simply provide paid health insurance “options” without robust support systems on campus. Because students are often stressed out, lack time and energy, and find it hard to navigate the complicated systems of profit-driven health care industry, the lack of direct support in graduate students’ day-to-day healthcare needs can cause tremendous loss on their success and productivity. Hence, universities have tremendous opportunities to better understand and address their graduate students’ real needs so as to add value to institutional success and productivity.

AB - This constructivist study explores 16 graduate assistants’ (GAs) healthcare experiences and uses grounded theory to create a model of graduate assistants’ experiences with university-provided healthcare in a large research university. The model is composed of four broad components: (a) systems; (b) access, care and coverage; (c) knowledge, quality and cost; and (d) self. Graduate assistants’ needs and expectations constantly negotiate various systems in the model. Expanding upon the limited research regarding graduate student healthcare, this study provides implications for higher education administrators and policy makers. Based on our study findings we argue that it is not sufficient for university administrations to simply provide paid health insurance “options” without robust support systems on campus. Because students are often stressed out, lack time and energy, and find it hard to navigate the complicated systems of profit-driven health care industry, the lack of direct support in graduate students’ day-to-day healthcare needs can cause tremendous loss on their success and productivity. Hence, universities have tremendous opportunities to better understand and address their graduate students’ real needs so as to add value to institutional success and productivity.

KW - Administration

KW - Constructivism

KW - Graduate students

KW - Healthcare

KW - Higher education

KW - Learning environment

KW - Policy

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Student benefits

KW - Union

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929748746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929748746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929748746

VL - 20

SP - 482

EP - 497

JO - Qualitative Report

JF - Qualitative Report

SN - 1052-0147

IS - 4

M1 - 7

ER -