Abstract

Social conflicts related to biodiversity conservation and adaptation policy to climate change in coastal areas illustrate the need to reinforce understanding of the "matters of concern" as well as the "matters of fact". In this paper, we argue that we must rethink adaptation from a new perspective, considering that humans together function as both ecological actors and social actors. Using international examples from the UNESCO world biosphere reserve network, we show that an ontological perspective may provide a simple and compact way to think about coupled infrastructure systems and systematic formalism, allowing for understanding of the relational matrix between actors, institutions and ecosystems. We contend that our formalism responds to three challenges. First, it encompasses the different regional contexts and policies that rely on the same ontology. Second, it provides a method to relate any local adaptation plan to the conservation paradigms that originate from the ecological modernization of policies. Third, it facilitates the discovery of drivers and processes involved in adaptation and management regime shifts by highlighting the way contextual factors configure, determine the structure of the action situation of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD) (Ostrom 2005), and how it operates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4171
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 13 2018

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
heuristics
conceptual framework
Climate change
biodiversity
Conservation
climate change
conservation
Modernization
management
Ecosystems
ecological modernization
Ontology
social conflict
UNESCO
local adaptation
biosphere reserve
social actor
infrastructure
ontology

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Biosphere reserves
  • Camargue
  • Danube
  • Garden Route
  • IAD framework
  • Management regime
  • Ontology
  • Social-ecological system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

A conceptual framework for heuristic progress in exploring management regime shifts in biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation of coastal areas. / Mathevet, Raphaël; Allouche, Aurélien; Nicolas, Laurence; Mitroi, Veronica; Fabricius, Christo; Guerbois, Chloé; Anderies, John.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 11, 4171, 13.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mathevet, Raphaël ; Allouche, Aurélien ; Nicolas, Laurence ; Mitroi, Veronica ; Fabricius, Christo ; Guerbois, Chloé ; Anderies, John. / A conceptual framework for heuristic progress in exploring management regime shifts in biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation of coastal areas. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 11.
@article{4d40b68d03b04ca19ef8b51ecaa4fb2d,
title = "A conceptual framework for heuristic progress in exploring management regime shifts in biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation of coastal areas",
abstract = "Social conflicts related to biodiversity conservation and adaptation policy to climate change in coastal areas illustrate the need to reinforce understanding of the {"}matters of concern{"} as well as the {"}matters of fact{"}. In this paper, we argue that we must rethink adaptation from a new perspective, considering that humans together function as both ecological actors and social actors. Using international examples from the UNESCO world biosphere reserve network, we show that an ontological perspective may provide a simple and compact way to think about coupled infrastructure systems and systematic formalism, allowing for understanding of the relational matrix between actors, institutions and ecosystems. We contend that our formalism responds to three challenges. First, it encompasses the different regional contexts and policies that rely on the same ontology. Second, it provides a method to relate any local adaptation plan to the conservation paradigms that originate from the ecological modernization of policies. Third, it facilitates the discovery of drivers and processes involved in adaptation and management regime shifts by highlighting the way contextual factors configure, determine the structure of the action situation of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD) (Ostrom 2005), and how it operates.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Biosphere reserves, Camargue, Danube, Garden Route, IAD framework, Management regime, Ontology, Social-ecological system",
author = "Rapha{\"e}l Mathevet and Aur{\'e}lien Allouche and Laurence Nicolas and Veronica Mitroi and Christo Fabricius and Chlo{\'e} Guerbois and John Anderies",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3390/su10114171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A conceptual framework for heuristic progress in exploring management regime shifts in biodiversity conservation and climate change adaptation of coastal areas

AU - Mathevet, Raphaël

AU - Allouche, Aurélien

AU - Nicolas, Laurence

AU - Mitroi, Veronica

AU - Fabricius, Christo

AU - Guerbois, Chloé

AU - Anderies, John

PY - 2018/11/13

Y1 - 2018/11/13

N2 - Social conflicts related to biodiversity conservation and adaptation policy to climate change in coastal areas illustrate the need to reinforce understanding of the "matters of concern" as well as the "matters of fact". In this paper, we argue that we must rethink adaptation from a new perspective, considering that humans together function as both ecological actors and social actors. Using international examples from the UNESCO world biosphere reserve network, we show that an ontological perspective may provide a simple and compact way to think about coupled infrastructure systems and systematic formalism, allowing for understanding of the relational matrix between actors, institutions and ecosystems. We contend that our formalism responds to three challenges. First, it encompasses the different regional contexts and policies that rely on the same ontology. Second, it provides a method to relate any local adaptation plan to the conservation paradigms that originate from the ecological modernization of policies. Third, it facilitates the discovery of drivers and processes involved in adaptation and management regime shifts by highlighting the way contextual factors configure, determine the structure of the action situation of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD) (Ostrom 2005), and how it operates.

AB - Social conflicts related to biodiversity conservation and adaptation policy to climate change in coastal areas illustrate the need to reinforce understanding of the "matters of concern" as well as the "matters of fact". In this paper, we argue that we must rethink adaptation from a new perspective, considering that humans together function as both ecological actors and social actors. Using international examples from the UNESCO world biosphere reserve network, we show that an ontological perspective may provide a simple and compact way to think about coupled infrastructure systems and systematic formalism, allowing for understanding of the relational matrix between actors, institutions and ecosystems. We contend that our formalism responds to three challenges. First, it encompasses the different regional contexts and policies that rely on the same ontology. Second, it provides a method to relate any local adaptation plan to the conservation paradigms that originate from the ecological modernization of policies. Third, it facilitates the discovery of drivers and processes involved in adaptation and management regime shifts by highlighting the way contextual factors configure, determine the structure of the action situation of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD) (Ostrom 2005), and how it operates.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Biosphere reserves

KW - Camargue

KW - Danube

KW - Garden Route

KW - IAD framework

KW - Management regime

KW - Ontology

KW - Social-ecological system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056483281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056483281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10114171

DO - 10.3390/su10114171

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 11

M1 - 4171

ER -