@inproceedings{ee2ec150ab8b45c894c07dbd6c56f722,
title = "A comparison of usability evaluations conducted by different teams",
abstract = "The wide variety of usability methods available to usability engineers offer many approaches to usability testing. However, different evaluation methodologies may lead to the identification of varying interface issues, and different interface designs may result. This study examined how different usability teams approach the same interface evaluation. The results indicate that different teams begin their evaluations in similar manners but tend to diverge after this point. Furthermore, different interface problems are identified by the teams. However, when similar issues are identified, the teams' redesign recommendations are similar. In general, the results indicate that several evaluators and several methods should be utilized to optimize the identification of interface issues.",
keywords = "Design pro cess, Interface evaluation, Usability, User interface",
author = "Rowe, {Anna L.} and Tammy Lowry and Halgren, {Shannon L.} and Cooke, {Nancy J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 1994 ACM.; Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1994 ; Conference date: 24-04-1994 Through 28-04-1994",
year = "1994",
month = apr,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1145/259963.260087",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
pages = "109--110",
editor = "Catherine Plaisant",
booktitle = "Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1994",
}