A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells

John W. Hutchins, Kuang C. Liu, Thomas E. Lacy, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Brett A. Bednarcyk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Two distinct triaxial braid architectures are compared in this numerical study: (1) the "raditional" triaxial braid in which the axial tows are merely laid in between the woven biased (±θ°) tows and (2) the "true" triaxial braid in which the axial tows are interleaved through the biased tows. The microstructure of the triaxial braids is constrained as a function of volume fraction, braid angle, and tow geometries. A multiscale modeling methodology is developed to use the Generalized Method of Cells (GMC) micromechanics model recursively over multiple length scales in a three step homogenization process to compare the effective elastic properties of the two different types of triaxial braids. This methodology has previously been used to accurately predict experimental results for the "traditional" triaxial braid architecture; however, this paper simply compares the two types of braid architectures numerically. Preliminary results show that the "true" triaxial braid follows most of the trends of the "aditional" triaxial braid in effective stiffness properties as a function of braid angle, except for the axial modulus at higher braid angles. At braid angles in excess of 45°, the "true" triaxial braid shows an increase in axial stiffness. The axial modulus of the "true" triaxial braid exceeds that of the "traditional" triaxial braid for braid angles greater than 50°. Therefore, the "true" triaxial braid does present a viable alternate braid that may offer advantages over the "traditional" triaxial braid for certain applications. An experimental study is being prepared to compare the two triaxial braids experimentally and to validate the numerical model used in the present study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCollection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
StatePublished - 2010
Event51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Apr 12 2010Apr 15 2010

Other

Other51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period4/12/104/15/10

Fingerprint

Stiffness
Micromechanics
Composite materials
Numerical models
Volume fraction
Microstructure
Geometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture

Cite this

Hutchins, J. W., Liu, K. C., Lacy, T. E., Chattopadhyay, A., & Bednarcyk, B. A. (2010). A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference [2010-2520]

A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells. / Hutchins, John W.; Liu, Kuang C.; Lacy, Thomas E.; Chattopadhyay, Aditi; Bednarcyk, Brett A.

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010. 2010-2520.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Hutchins, JW, Liu, KC, Lacy, TE, Chattopadhyay, A & Bednarcyk, BA 2010, A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells. in Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference., 2010-2520, 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, United States, 4/12/10.
Hutchins JW, Liu KC, Lacy TE, Chattopadhyay A, Bednarcyk BA. A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010. 2010-2520
Hutchins, John W. ; Liu, Kuang C. ; Lacy, Thomas E. ; Chattopadhyay, Aditi ; Bednarcyk, Brett A. / A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells. Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 2010.
@inproceedings{7a88f354c6f447e385396a30273e1cfd,
title = "A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells",
abstract = "Two distinct triaxial braid architectures are compared in this numerical study: (1) the {"}raditional{"} triaxial braid in which the axial tows are merely laid in between the woven biased (±θ°) tows and (2) the {"}true{"} triaxial braid in which the axial tows are interleaved through the biased tows. The microstructure of the triaxial braids is constrained as a function of volume fraction, braid angle, and tow geometries. A multiscale modeling methodology is developed to use the Generalized Method of Cells (GMC) micromechanics model recursively over multiple length scales in a three step homogenization process to compare the effective elastic properties of the two different types of triaxial braids. This methodology has previously been used to accurately predict experimental results for the {"}traditional{"} triaxial braid architecture; however, this paper simply compares the two types of braid architectures numerically. Preliminary results show that the {"}true{"} triaxial braid follows most of the trends of the {"}aditional{"} triaxial braid in effective stiffness properties as a function of braid angle, except for the axial modulus at higher braid angles. At braid angles in excess of 45°, the {"}true{"} triaxial braid shows an increase in axial stiffness. The axial modulus of the {"}true{"} triaxial braid exceeds that of the {"}traditional{"} triaxial braid for braid angles greater than 50°. Therefore, the {"}true{"} triaxial braid does present a viable alternate braid that may offer advantages over the {"}traditional{"} triaxial braid for certain applications. An experimental study is being prepared to compare the two triaxial braids experimentally and to validate the numerical model used in the present study.",
author = "Hutchins, {John W.} and Liu, {Kuang C.} and Lacy, {Thomas E.} and Aditi Chattopadhyay and Bednarcyk, {Brett A.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781600867422",
booktitle = "Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of triaxially braided composites using the generalized method of cells

AU - Hutchins, John W.

AU - Liu, Kuang C.

AU - Lacy, Thomas E.

AU - Chattopadhyay, Aditi

AU - Bednarcyk, Brett A.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Two distinct triaxial braid architectures are compared in this numerical study: (1) the "raditional" triaxial braid in which the axial tows are merely laid in between the woven biased (±θ°) tows and (2) the "true" triaxial braid in which the axial tows are interleaved through the biased tows. The microstructure of the triaxial braids is constrained as a function of volume fraction, braid angle, and tow geometries. A multiscale modeling methodology is developed to use the Generalized Method of Cells (GMC) micromechanics model recursively over multiple length scales in a three step homogenization process to compare the effective elastic properties of the two different types of triaxial braids. This methodology has previously been used to accurately predict experimental results for the "traditional" triaxial braid architecture; however, this paper simply compares the two types of braid architectures numerically. Preliminary results show that the "true" triaxial braid follows most of the trends of the "aditional" triaxial braid in effective stiffness properties as a function of braid angle, except for the axial modulus at higher braid angles. At braid angles in excess of 45°, the "true" triaxial braid shows an increase in axial stiffness. The axial modulus of the "true" triaxial braid exceeds that of the "traditional" triaxial braid for braid angles greater than 50°. Therefore, the "true" triaxial braid does present a viable alternate braid that may offer advantages over the "traditional" triaxial braid for certain applications. An experimental study is being prepared to compare the two triaxial braids experimentally and to validate the numerical model used in the present study.

AB - Two distinct triaxial braid architectures are compared in this numerical study: (1) the "raditional" triaxial braid in which the axial tows are merely laid in between the woven biased (±θ°) tows and (2) the "true" triaxial braid in which the axial tows are interleaved through the biased tows. The microstructure of the triaxial braids is constrained as a function of volume fraction, braid angle, and tow geometries. A multiscale modeling methodology is developed to use the Generalized Method of Cells (GMC) micromechanics model recursively over multiple length scales in a three step homogenization process to compare the effective elastic properties of the two different types of triaxial braids. This methodology has previously been used to accurately predict experimental results for the "traditional" triaxial braid architecture; however, this paper simply compares the two types of braid architectures numerically. Preliminary results show that the "true" triaxial braid follows most of the trends of the "aditional" triaxial braid in effective stiffness properties as a function of braid angle, except for the axial modulus at higher braid angles. At braid angles in excess of 45°, the "true" triaxial braid shows an increase in axial stiffness. The axial modulus of the "true" triaxial braid exceeds that of the "traditional" triaxial braid for braid angles greater than 50°. Therefore, the "true" triaxial braid does present a viable alternate braid that may offer advantages over the "traditional" triaxial braid for certain applications. An experimental study is being prepared to compare the two triaxial braids experimentally and to validate the numerical model used in the present study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855634366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855634366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781600867422

BT - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

ER -