A comparison of scheduling philosophies for manufacturing cells

Ronald Askin, Anand Iyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we compare three approaches for assigning workers to tasks and controlling the movement of jobs through cellular manufacturing systems. The objective is to minimize throughput time for part batches. The scheduling approaches considered include 1) individual machine loading with batches being sequenced on a first come, first served basis; 2) a cell dedication strategy wherein the cell is devoted to a single product type at a time; and 3) a job enrichment strategy where each batch is assigned to a single, cross-trained operator who must perform all batch operations. The approaches are compared by queueing approximations and simulation over a variety of conditions. Dedicated cells are shown to perform best when cells are large, with balanced workloads and large lot sizes. Assigning batches to cross-trained workers may produce quality and morale advantages without adversely affecting throughput times as compared to traditional batch handling techniques, particularly if machines are not heavily utilized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-449
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 24 1993

Fingerprint

Cellular manufacturing
Batch
scheduling
manufacturing
Manufacturing
Scheduling
Throughput
Cell
job enrichment
worker
workload
Cellular Manufacturing Systems
simulation
Lot Size
Queueing
Workload
Philosophy
philosophy
time
Minimise

Keywords

  • Cellular manufacturing
  • Group technology
  • Scheduling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Transportation

Cite this

A comparison of scheduling philosophies for manufacturing cells. / Askin, Ronald; Iyer, Anand.

In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 69, No. 3, 24.09.1993, p. 438-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5dc33ea980c548048d3eb3d7b4985d09,
title = "A comparison of scheduling philosophies for manufacturing cells",
abstract = "In this paper we compare three approaches for assigning workers to tasks and controlling the movement of jobs through cellular manufacturing systems. The objective is to minimize throughput time for part batches. The scheduling approaches considered include 1) individual machine loading with batches being sequenced on a first come, first served basis; 2) a cell dedication strategy wherein the cell is devoted to a single product type at a time; and 3) a job enrichment strategy where each batch is assigned to a single, cross-trained operator who must perform all batch operations. The approaches are compared by queueing approximations and simulation over a variety of conditions. Dedicated cells are shown to perform best when cells are large, with balanced workloads and large lot sizes. Assigning batches to cross-trained workers may produce quality and morale advantages without adversely affecting throughput times as compared to traditional batch handling techniques, particularly if machines are not heavily utilized.",
keywords = "Cellular manufacturing, Group technology, Scheduling",
author = "Ronald Askin and Anand Iyer",
year = "1993",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/0377-2217(93)90027-K",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "438--449",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of scheduling philosophies for manufacturing cells

AU - Askin, Ronald

AU - Iyer, Anand

PY - 1993/9/24

Y1 - 1993/9/24

N2 - In this paper we compare three approaches for assigning workers to tasks and controlling the movement of jobs through cellular manufacturing systems. The objective is to minimize throughput time for part batches. The scheduling approaches considered include 1) individual machine loading with batches being sequenced on a first come, first served basis; 2) a cell dedication strategy wherein the cell is devoted to a single product type at a time; and 3) a job enrichment strategy where each batch is assigned to a single, cross-trained operator who must perform all batch operations. The approaches are compared by queueing approximations and simulation over a variety of conditions. Dedicated cells are shown to perform best when cells are large, with balanced workloads and large lot sizes. Assigning batches to cross-trained workers may produce quality and morale advantages without adversely affecting throughput times as compared to traditional batch handling techniques, particularly if machines are not heavily utilized.

AB - In this paper we compare three approaches for assigning workers to tasks and controlling the movement of jobs through cellular manufacturing systems. The objective is to minimize throughput time for part batches. The scheduling approaches considered include 1) individual machine loading with batches being sequenced on a first come, first served basis; 2) a cell dedication strategy wherein the cell is devoted to a single product type at a time; and 3) a job enrichment strategy where each batch is assigned to a single, cross-trained operator who must perform all batch operations. The approaches are compared by queueing approximations and simulation over a variety of conditions. Dedicated cells are shown to perform best when cells are large, with balanced workloads and large lot sizes. Assigning batches to cross-trained workers may produce quality and morale advantages without adversely affecting throughput times as compared to traditional batch handling techniques, particularly if machines are not heavily utilized.

KW - Cellular manufacturing

KW - Group technology

KW - Scheduling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027660881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027660881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90027-K

DO - 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90027-K

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 438

EP - 449

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 3

ER -