A comparison of different conceptualizations of perceived alternatives in turnover research

Rodger W. Griffeth, Peter Hom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study compared the relative predictive validity of different formulations of perceived alternatives in turnover models. These formulations varied according to different levels of specificity and proximity to turnover criteria and were examined within the framework of the Mobley turnover theory (1977; Mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino, 1979). A sample of 244 nurses was administered a survey assessing determinants of turnover. Six months later voluntary turnover data were collected. While intention to quit and turnover were significantly predicted by their antecedents, the results were not entirely supportive of Mobley's theory. Methodological and theoretical reasons were advanced for the inconsistent findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-111
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of different conceptualizations of perceived alternatives in turnover research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this