A comparison of absolute and relative changes in precipitation in multimodel climate projection

Noel C. Baker, Huei-Ping Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares two methods of multimodel averaging for the future projection of precipitation based on the classically defined absolute and relative climate changes. In the relative change scheme, the multimodel average of the percentage changes in precipitation is multiplied by the observed present climate to form the future projection; this method is equivalent to applying unequal weighting to the absolute change scheme which potentially implies a bias correction. The new scheme and the classical equal weight scheme for the absolute change do not produce radically different large-scale patterns of the trend in precipitation. Nevertheless, notable differences emerge in regional scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-179
Number of pages6
JournalAtmospheric Science Letters
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

climate
climate change
method
comparison
trend

Keywords

  • Bias correction
  • Ensemble average
  • Precipitation
  • Weighting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

A comparison of absolute and relative changes in precipitation in multimodel climate projection. / Baker, Noel C.; Huang, Huei-Ping.

In: Atmospheric Science Letters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 174-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{42cc6cf4c53e4171aecf67b4b3406ad8,
title = "A comparison of absolute and relative changes in precipitation in multimodel climate projection",
abstract = "This study compares two methods of multimodel averaging for the future projection of precipitation based on the classically defined absolute and relative climate changes. In the relative change scheme, the multimodel average of the percentage changes in precipitation is multiplied by the observed present climate to form the future projection; this method is equivalent to applying unequal weighting to the absolute change scheme which potentially implies a bias correction. The new scheme and the classical equal weight scheme for the absolute change do not produce radically different large-scale patterns of the trend in precipitation. Nevertheless, notable differences emerge in regional scales.",
keywords = "Bias correction, Ensemble average, Precipitation, Weighting",
author = "Baker, {Noel C.} and Huei-Ping Huang",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/asl.388",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "174--179",
journal = "Atmospheric Science Letters",
issn = "1530-261X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of absolute and relative changes in precipitation in multimodel climate projection

AU - Baker, Noel C.

AU - Huang, Huei-Ping

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - This study compares two methods of multimodel averaging for the future projection of precipitation based on the classically defined absolute and relative climate changes. In the relative change scheme, the multimodel average of the percentage changes in precipitation is multiplied by the observed present climate to form the future projection; this method is equivalent to applying unequal weighting to the absolute change scheme which potentially implies a bias correction. The new scheme and the classical equal weight scheme for the absolute change do not produce radically different large-scale patterns of the trend in precipitation. Nevertheless, notable differences emerge in regional scales.

AB - This study compares two methods of multimodel averaging for the future projection of precipitation based on the classically defined absolute and relative climate changes. In the relative change scheme, the multimodel average of the percentage changes in precipitation is multiplied by the observed present climate to form the future projection; this method is equivalent to applying unequal weighting to the absolute change scheme which potentially implies a bias correction. The new scheme and the classical equal weight scheme for the absolute change do not produce radically different large-scale patterns of the trend in precipitation. Nevertheless, notable differences emerge in regional scales.

KW - Bias correction

KW - Ensemble average

KW - Precipitation

KW - Weighting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864069438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864069438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/asl.388

DO - 10.1002/asl.388

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864069438

VL - 13

SP - 174

EP - 179

JO - Atmospheric Science Letters

JF - Atmospheric Science Letters

SN - 1530-261X

IS - 3

ER -