TY - GEN
T1 - A comparative study of quasi-solid nanoclay based electrolyte and liquid electrolyte dye sensitized solar cells
AU - Main, Laura
AU - Munukutla, Lakshmi
AU - Fauss, Brian
AU - Curtis, Travis
AU - Mada Kannan, Arunachala
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are currently being explored as a cheaper alternative to the more common silicon (Si) solar cell technology with improved performance in low light conditions and less sensitivity to varying angles of incident light. One of the major challenges facing DSSCs is loss of the liquid electrolyte, through evaporation or leakage, which lowers stability and leads to increased degradation. To address this, batches of gel electrolyte cells are fabricated with 7 wt% nanoclay gel electrolyte and liquid electrolyte and were evaluated at standard test conditions over time. The gel cells achieved efficiencies as high as 9.18% compared to the 9.65% achieved by the liquid cells. Over a period of 10 days, the liquid cells degraded less than 20% of its maximum efficiency. By contrast, the gel cell's efficiency did not decrease to 20% of its maximum efficiency until 45 days. After several measurements, the liquid cells showed visible signs of leakage through the sealant, whereas the gel cells did not. This resistance to leakage likely contributed to the improved performance of the quasi-solid cells over liquid electrolyte DSSCs.
AB - Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are currently being explored as a cheaper alternative to the more common silicon (Si) solar cell technology with improved performance in low light conditions and less sensitivity to varying angles of incident light. One of the major challenges facing DSSCs is loss of the liquid electrolyte, through evaporation or leakage, which lowers stability and leads to increased degradation. To address this, batches of gel electrolyte cells are fabricated with 7 wt% nanoclay gel electrolyte and liquid electrolyte and were evaluated at standard test conditions over time. The gel cells achieved efficiencies as high as 9.18% compared to the 9.65% achieved by the liquid cells. Over a period of 10 days, the liquid cells degraded less than 20% of its maximum efficiency. By contrast, the gel cell's efficiency did not decrease to 20% of its maximum efficiency until 45 days. After several measurements, the liquid cells showed visible signs of leakage through the sealant, whereas the gel cells did not. This resistance to leakage likely contributed to the improved performance of the quasi-solid cells over liquid electrolyte DSSCs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900319009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900319009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1557/opl.2013.977
DO - 10.1557/opl.2013.977
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84900319009
SN - 9781632661265
T3 - Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings
SP - 84
EP - 89
BT - Organic and Hybrid Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
PB - Materials Research Society
T2 - 2013 MRS Spring Meeting
Y2 - 1 April 2013 through 5 April 2013
ER -