A comparative examination of the efficiency of sequestering carbon in US agricultural soils

John M. Antle, Susan M. Capalbo, Sian Mooney, Edward T. Elliott, Keith H. Paustian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the need to integrate biophysical and economic data to assess the competitiveness of US agriculture to provide soil carbon (C) and participate in a market for C credits. The paper discusses alternative methods of calculating the costs of soil C sequestration and compares the cost of sequestering soil C in Iowa and Montana. Results indicate that the opportunity cost per Mg of sequestered C varies in response to regional resource endowments and net returns. Economic models show that Montana could sequester a relatively small amount of soil C annually at a lower opportunity cost per Mg than Iowa, but Iowa can sequester larger quantities more efficiently. These results are compared with estimates of the cost of C sequestration from other domestic and international studies, and suggest that US agriculture could be competitive in domestic or international markets for C reduction credits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-115
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Alternative Agriculture
Volume17
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

agricultural soils
Soil
Carbon
Costs and Cost Analysis
opportunity costs
carbon
credit
soil
Agriculture
agriculture
world markets
econometric models
Economic Models
Financial Management
markets
economics
Economics
methodology

Keywords

  • Carbon credits
  • Carbon reduction credits
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Economics of carbon sequestration
  • Soil carbon storage
  • US agriculture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A comparative examination of the efficiency of sequestering carbon in US agricultural soils. / Antle, John M.; Capalbo, Susan M.; Mooney, Sian; Elliott, Edward T.; Paustian, Keith H.

In: American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, Vol. 17, No. 3, 09.2002, p. 109-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Antle, John M. ; Capalbo, Susan M. ; Mooney, Sian ; Elliott, Edward T. ; Paustian, Keith H. / A comparative examination of the efficiency of sequestering carbon in US agricultural soils. In: American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 2002 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 109-115.
@article{df94cf52daa24c048ba8476ec48a10ce,
title = "A comparative examination of the efficiency of sequestering carbon in US agricultural soils",
abstract = "This paper demonstrates the need to integrate biophysical and economic data to assess the competitiveness of US agriculture to provide soil carbon (C) and participate in a market for C credits. The paper discusses alternative methods of calculating the costs of soil C sequestration and compares the cost of sequestering soil C in Iowa and Montana. Results indicate that the opportunity cost per Mg of sequestered C varies in response to regional resource endowments and net returns. Economic models show that Montana could sequester a relatively small amount of soil C annually at a lower opportunity cost per Mg than Iowa, but Iowa can sequester larger quantities more efficiently. These results are compared with estimates of the cost of C sequestration from other domestic and international studies, and suggest that US agriculture could be competitive in domestic or international markets for C reduction credits.",
keywords = "Carbon credits, Carbon reduction credits, Carbon sequestration, Economics of carbon sequestration, Soil carbon storage, US agriculture",
author = "Antle, {John M.} and Capalbo, {Susan M.} and Sian Mooney and Elliott, {Edward T.} and Paustian, {Keith H.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "109--115",
journal = "Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems",
issn = "1742-1705",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative examination of the efficiency of sequestering carbon in US agricultural soils

AU - Antle, John M.

AU - Capalbo, Susan M.

AU - Mooney, Sian

AU - Elliott, Edward T.

AU - Paustian, Keith H.

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - This paper demonstrates the need to integrate biophysical and economic data to assess the competitiveness of US agriculture to provide soil carbon (C) and participate in a market for C credits. The paper discusses alternative methods of calculating the costs of soil C sequestration and compares the cost of sequestering soil C in Iowa and Montana. Results indicate that the opportunity cost per Mg of sequestered C varies in response to regional resource endowments and net returns. Economic models show that Montana could sequester a relatively small amount of soil C annually at a lower opportunity cost per Mg than Iowa, but Iowa can sequester larger quantities more efficiently. These results are compared with estimates of the cost of C sequestration from other domestic and international studies, and suggest that US agriculture could be competitive in domestic or international markets for C reduction credits.

AB - This paper demonstrates the need to integrate biophysical and economic data to assess the competitiveness of US agriculture to provide soil carbon (C) and participate in a market for C credits. The paper discusses alternative methods of calculating the costs of soil C sequestration and compares the cost of sequestering soil C in Iowa and Montana. Results indicate that the opportunity cost per Mg of sequestered C varies in response to regional resource endowments and net returns. Economic models show that Montana could sequester a relatively small amount of soil C annually at a lower opportunity cost per Mg than Iowa, but Iowa can sequester larger quantities more efficiently. These results are compared with estimates of the cost of C sequestration from other domestic and international studies, and suggest that US agriculture could be competitive in domestic or international markets for C reduction credits.

KW - Carbon credits

KW - Carbon reduction credits

KW - Carbon sequestration

KW - Economics of carbon sequestration

KW - Soil carbon storage

KW - US agriculture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036732389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036732389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036732389

VL - 17

SP - 109

EP - 115

JO - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

JF - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

SN - 1742-1705

IS - 3

ER -