35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology

Mark William Neff; Elizabeth Corley

doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3

35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology

Mark William Neff, Elizabeth Corley

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

122 Scopus citations

Abstract

We utilize the bibliometric tool of co-word analysis to identify trends in the methods and subjects of ecology during the period 1970-2005. Few previous co-word analyses have attempted to analyze fields as large as ecology. We utilize a method of isolating concepts and methods in large datasets that undergo the most significant upward and downward trends. Our analysis identifies policy-relevant trends in the field of ecology, a discipline that helps to identify and frame many contemporary policy problems. The results provide a new foundation for exploring the relations among public policies, technological change, and the evolution of science priorities.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	657-682
Number of pages	26
Journal	Scientometrics
Volume	80
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3
State	Published - Aug 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Sciences(all)
Computer Science Applications
Library and Information Sciences

Access to Document

10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3

Cite this

@article{252727514cda4bf3af4f07626b75c8e6,

title = "35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology",

abstract = "We utilize the bibliometric tool of co-word analysis to identify trends in the methods and subjects of ecology during the period 1970-2005. Few previous co-word analyses have attempted to analyze fields as large as ecology. We utilize a method of isolating concepts and methods in large datasets that undergo the most significant upward and downward trends. Our analysis identifies policy-relevant trends in the field of ecology, a discipline that helps to identify and frame many contemporary policy problems. The results provide a new foundation for exploring the relations among public policies, technological change, and the evolution of science priorities.",

author = "Neff, {Mark William} and Elizabeth Corley",

note = "Funding Information: This material is based upon the work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0345604. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We are indebted to Search Technology, Inc for access to the software program Vantage Point (www.thevantagepoint.com). We gratefully acknowledge comments on previous drafts of this paper by Bethany Cutts, Kate Darby, Kris Gade, Maya Kapoor, Ann Kinzig, Libby Larson, Thad Miller, Charles Perrings, Dan Sarewitz, and Shade Shutters. Shivshankar Venugopal offered critical support in the calculation of centrality and density.",

year = "2009",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "80",

pages = "657--682",

journal = "Scientometrics",

issn = "0138-9130",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 35 years and 160,000 articles

T2 - A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology

AU - Neff, Mark William

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

N1 - Funding Information: This material is based upon the work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0345604. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We are indebted to Search Technology, Inc for access to the software program Vantage Point (www.thevantagepoint.com). We gratefully acknowledge comments on previous drafts of this paper by Bethany Cutts, Kate Darby, Kris Gade, Maya Kapoor, Ann Kinzig, Libby Larson, Thad Miller, Charles Perrings, Dan Sarewitz, and Shade Shutters. Shivshankar Venugopal offered critical support in the calculation of centrality and density.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - We utilize the bibliometric tool of co-word analysis to identify trends in the methods and subjects of ecology during the period 1970-2005. Few previous co-word analyses have attempted to analyze fields as large as ecology. We utilize a method of isolating concepts and methods in large datasets that undergo the most significant upward and downward trends. Our analysis identifies policy-relevant trends in the field of ecology, a discipline that helps to identify and frame many contemporary policy problems. The results provide a new foundation for exploring the relations among public policies, technological change, and the evolution of science priorities.

AB - We utilize the bibliometric tool of co-word analysis to identify trends in the methods and subjects of ecology during the period 1970-2005. Few previous co-word analyses have attempted to analyze fields as large as ecology. We utilize a method of isolating concepts and methods in large datasets that undergo the most significant upward and downward trends. Our analysis identifies policy-relevant trends in the field of ecology, a discipline that helps to identify and frame many contemporary policy problems. The results provide a new foundation for exploring the relations among public policies, technological change, and the evolution of science priorities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349319959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349319959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3

DO - 10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349319959

SN - 0138-9130

VL - 80

SP - 657

EP - 682

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

IS - 3

ER -

35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this