Categorizing Professionals’ Perspectives on Environmental Communication with Implications for Graduate Education

  • E. Goldman (Contributor)
  • Sojung Claire Kim (Contributor)
  • Dann Sklarew (Contributor)
  • Elizabeth Suhay (Contributor)
  • Katherine E. Rowan (Contributor)
  • David Tomblin (Contributor)
  • Carlos L. Muñoz Brenes (Contributor)
  • Lisa Gring-Pemble (Contributor)
  • Andrew Wingfield (Contributor)
  • Karen Akerlof (Contributor)
  • Elizabeth Ban Rohring (Contributor)
  • Kristin Timm (Contributor)
  • Cynthia Sandoval (Contributor)
  • Mahmud Farooque (Contributor)
  • Emily T. Cloyd (Contributor)
  • Cynthia Smith (Contributor)
  • Xiaoquan Zhao (Contributor)
  • Elizabeth C. Duesterhoeft (Contributor)
  • K. Curran (Contributor)
  • John Kotcher (Contributor)
  • Darren Milligan (Contributor)
  • Stephanie E. Hampton (Contributor)
  • Chris Clarke (Contributor)
  • James L. Olds (Contributor)
  • Crystal Upperman (Contributor)
  • Taryn Bromser-Kloeden (Contributor)



The study of environmental communication originated as a diverse multidisciplinary field encompassing a wide array of communicator perspectives. However, as the field evolved, mass media and journalism became its perceived scholarly focus. As a result, environmental communication processes may be less well-understood across other settings, such as scientific and research institutions, non-governmental organizations, and federal agencies. To understand how communicators describe their goals, ethics, and strategies within these contexts, we conducted a three-part study of researchers and practitioners working on environmental issues in the Washington, DC, region between October 2019 and January 2020. Employing Q methodology, we identified four distinct perspectives: capacity-builders, translators, policy and decision-supporters, and cultural changemakers. Each of these perspectives is associated with a different range of goals, ethics, and strategic approaches. We describe graduate educational competencies for each of the perspectives and discuss implications for the design of communication research to meet practitioners’ needs.
Date made availableJan 1 2021
Publisherfigshare Academic Research System

Cite this